Local clerks reassure voters of mail-in voting rights
Prior to the Supreme Court ruling Monday, local election officials were reassuring voters enrolled in the Michigan automatic absentee ballot program that there were no changes in voting by mail procedures and their ballots were valid and would be counted.
An effort by President Donald J. Trump to limit mail in voting was ruled unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court Monday in a decision upholding multiple rulings by lower courts across the country preventing federal interference in mail-in voting procedures.
In a prepared statement, the office of the Canton Township clerk said that eligible voters on the Michigan Permanent Absentee Ballot List remain on the list and should still expect ballots to be mailed to them automatically ahead of upcoming elections. The office said those voters do not need to reapply or take any other action because of the court decision."Nothing has changed for you today," the clerk's office said in the statement.
The latest ruling of the Supreme Court seemed to contradict an earlier decision Aug. 24 to lift a lower-court injunction that had blocked parts of an executive order President Trump signed in March directing the U.S. Postal Service to restrict delivery of mail ballots to voters included on a federally compiled list. The order, which the administration says was meant to bolster election security, had been put on hold in Michigan and roughly two dozen other mostly Democratic-led states after Michigan and other state attorneys general sued to block it.
That earlier Supreme Court decision did not rule on whether the executive order itself was lawful, and the latest decision Monday was considered a victory for voting rights groups, who strongly opposed interference at the federal level in elections which are run by the states, a system detailed in the U.S. Constitution.
Last week, another lower court ruled Trump’s attempts to interfere with mail-in voting were illegal and froze any new procedures at the U.S. Postal Service regarding delivery of mail-in ballots. Trump’s appeal of that decision prompted the Monday ruling from the Supreme Court which rejected his legal arguments.
Canton election officials said they would administer elections under existing Michigan and federal law and procedures and would notify voters directly if anything changes in how they register or cast ballots. The office urged voters to continue making plans as usual and to direct questions about registration or ballot status to local election officials rather than other sources.
The practical effect of the ruling on voters has been limited, and clerk's offices in nearby Wayne County communities report no changes to local absentee voting procedures because of the decision.
In Plymouth, Inkster, Romulus, Wayne and Westland, as in Canton, voters who are already enrolled in the Michigan Permanent Absentee Ballot List continue to have ballots mailed to them automatically for each election under the statewide list, which is maintained under state election law rather than by individual municipalities.
One change unrelated to the Supreme Court case is under way in the city of Plymouth. City election officials say that beginning in 2026, Plymouth will stop automatically mailing absentee ballot applications to voters who are on a separate, secondary list — the Permanent Absent Voter Application List — meaning those voters will need to request and return an application on their own to receive a ballot. The change does not affect voters who are on the Permanent Ballot List itself; those voters will continue to receive ballots automatically, according to city officials.
Michigan is among the states that sued to block the executive order and voting rights advocates say they expect further court challenges and attempts to affect voting before the November midterm elections.
Voters with questions about their registration, absentee ballot status or upcoming elections are encouraged to contact their local city or township clerk's office directly.














